Re: A follow-up to "the Collapse"

	Duration: 10:45 minutes Upload Time: 2007-04-27 07:02:33 User: cortmeister262 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: This is a video response to TheCharmingDeviant's video "A follow-up to "the Collapse"" on YouTube. For me, context is everything, DiMartini and other architects that boasted (pre-9/11) of the WTC Towers strength and survivability where talking about "hits from airliners" that were accidental or inadvertent. The only comparable event was the WW2 era Bomber plane that strayed into NYC in a dense fog and accidentally hit the Empire State Bldg. The Architects never planned on a plane hitting the towers at FULL SPEED! Speed is the crucial factor here, more speed, more kinetic energy. They simply didn't anticipate that fully fueled planes would ever be flown at maximum speed into the WTC Towers or any bldg. for that matter. The speed of the jets along with their massive fuel capacity was a one-two punch that the Towers could not withstand. All that kinetic energy blasted away the insulation on the beams, provided that there was adequate fire insulation to begin with. DiMartini was talking about slow speed, accidental hits, not high speed intentional hits. I don't think that fireman Joe Casaliggi was saying that these supposed "controlled demolitions" were the "cause" of the small size of the debris found in the aftermath of the collapse. Joe was simply explaining what he saw and experienced as he and his fellow firefighters worked "the pile", I think you may be reading too much into he's saying. If you have some other clip where Joe Casaliggi says, "I believe that controlled demolitions brought down the towers", I'll stand corrected. As far as these supposed "secondary explosions" that directly preceded the collapse of each tower, I've seen the same thing happen in catastrophic building fires, on a smaller scale of course. Just before collapse, there were open rooms and spaces in the towers that were full of smoke and fire. As the weight of the upper floors bore down on the fire softened steel, the building started to collapse. That creates overpressure, as the towers come down, smoke and flame are pushed out. The reporter in the chopper was reporting what he "thought" was an explosion, and I'll admit that the massive over pressure of the collapse and the subsequent fire and smoke that were ejected, looked like an explosion. But, explosions are unique, they create seismic forces that can be seen and measured. I'm sure that things were popping all over in the fires and that the firefighters did hear explosion, I contend that they were not demolition charges.
Comments
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites Check out the Steven Jones Debunking of the NIST report. He talks about the tests he did trying to mix aluminum and other things. 07-10-03 19:26:38 __________________________________________________
JenkleJ ::: Favorites yes the same war games exercises were going on in the U.K on the 7/7 terrorist attacks. coincidence. 07-09-16 19:48:13 __________________________________________________
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites Operation Northwoods? Gulf of Tonkin? USS Liberty? Combine this kind of past with the most corrupt administration in history, what do you get? Operation Northwoods V 2.0. 07-09-05 03:05:12 __________________________________________________
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites In a 2001 interview with Dimartini, he talks about a 707 impact (the largest plane at time of design), but then he went on to say that the towers could most likely withstand several impacts of jet liners (implying modern jet liners as well). 07-09-05 03:02:45 __________________________________________________
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites So we agree, this is good. What are the odds that Cheney and NORAD were running 'war game' scenarios that involved hijacked planed hitting the WTC on the morning 9/11? Like hitting the lottery twice, seriously. So why the war games? So that they could get everything ready without raising any suspicion. Think about it. IF they were involved, they couldn't just send away all the fighter jets with no reason. 07-09-05 02:57:14 __________________________________________________
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites Plastics and polyvinyl chlorides do not have that same characteristics as steel when they are melted. No yellow/orange glow or white smoke as seen in the videos. I don't think I can say it any more clearly. The mechanism that can turn steel into molten iron is thermite. What is seen in the videos has all the characteristics of molten iron, the product of a thermite reaction. 07-09-05 02:51:27 __________________________________________________
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites I was talking about specifically about Frank DiMartini, Minoru Yamasaki and the team that designed the WTC towers, back in the 1960's, anticipating a suicide hijacking and ramming planes full of fuel at high speed into the towers. I should have made that more clear. 07-09-03 04:48:05 __________________________________________________
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites I totally agree with you about the U.S. Government knowing all about suicide hijackers before 9-11. They knew about 'The Project Bojinka Plot' from the Phillipines from 1995 and then earlier in 2001, they where specifically warned about the concept of hijacked airliners being crashed into the G8 Summit site while Bush was in Europe. And of course, as you said, that very day of 9-11, Cheney and NORAD were running 'war game' scenarios that involved hijacked planed hitting the WTC. 07-09-03 04:46:45 __________________________________________________
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites I'm not convinced that that was molten metal pouring from the South Tower just before it collapsed. I don't understand the mechanism that could create a stream of molten metal like that, I suspect that it may have been plastics and polyvinyl chlorides from the office furnishings, carpets, and plastics. 07-09-03 04:46:25 __________________________________________________
WhyNotTruth ::: Favorites You address alot of points in this video, but how can you explain away the molten metal pouring from the south tower just before its collapse? There are other things you did not address (possibly because of time restrictions) but lets start with that. 07-09-02 18:32:15 __________________________________________________